The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has agreed to consult his lawyers before proceeding with his defence in the terrorism case filed against him by the Federal Government.
During Wednesday’s hearing at the Federal High Court in Abuja, Justice James Omotosho once again advised Kanu to seek proper legal guidance after he repeatedly insisted that the seven-count charge against him was invalid.
Although Kanu initially refused to open his defence, he eventually told the court that he would like to meet with his legal team, which includes Nnaemeka Ejiofor, Aloy Ejimakor, Maxwell Okpara, and Mandela Umegborogu.
Justice Omotosho then adjourned the matter to November 7, marking the fourth time Kanu has been given the chance to either begin his defence or waive his right to do so.
Kanu had previously dismissed his legal team, which was led by former Attorney General of the Federation, Kanu Agabi (SAN), choosing instead to represent himself. At that time, he submitted a list of 23 witnesses, including Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and FCT Minister Nyesom Wike, but later changed his mind, claiming there was no valid case to answer.
At Wednesday’s session, Kanu maintained that position, arguing that the law under which he is being tried — the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act — has been repealed.
“The Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act has been repealed. I cannot put up a defence under a repealed law,” he told the court.
Read Also;
Court grants Sowore, Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyer, 11 others bail
The Federal Government’s counsel, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), urged the court to compel Kanu to either open his defence or forfeit that right, noting that the prosecution had already closed its case since June 19, 2025, after calling five witnesses. The court had earlier ruled, on September 26, that a prima facie case had been established against Kanu.
However, Justice Omotosho said he would once again “bend backward” in the interest of justice, giving Kanu another opportunity to consult with lawyers experienced in criminal law before the next sitting.
