In a dramatic courtroom appearance, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (Kogi Central) was arraigned before the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday on six counts of alleged cybercrime against Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello.
The Charges and Court Proceedings
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) senator pleaded not guilty to all charges, which stem from allegations that she made defamatory statements on live television accusing Akpabio and Bello of plotting her assassination. Justice Mohammed Umar granted her bail on self-recognition, citing her status as a serving senator and senior legal practitioner.
Her lead counsel, Roland Otaru (SAN), successfully argued for bail on self-recognition, noting that the prosecution had not filed any counter-affidavit challenging her application. The judge subsequently adjourned the case to September 22, 2025, for trial commencement.
High-Profile Support in Court
Senator Natasha arrived at the courthouse accompanied by her husband, former Delta State Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan, prominent activist Aisha Yesufu, and a group of supporters. This marks her second arraignment in two weeks, following a previous court appearance on June 19, 2025, where she faced defamation charges at the FCT High Court.
Prosecution’s Failed Bench Warrant Attempt
In a previous hearing, the Federal Government had sought a bench warrant for her arrest after she failed to appear in court. However, the judge rejected the application, ruling that since the charges were served on her lawyer on the same day of the hearing, it was unreasonable to expect her to be present.
The case, filed by the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation, centers on allegations of cybercrime, particularly her televised claims of an assassination plot against her.
What’s Next?
With the trial set for September, legal analysts suggest this case could set a precedent for how cybercrime allegations against public figures are handled in Nigeria. Senator Natasha remains defiant, maintaining her innocence, while the prosecution prepares its case.
Key Takeaway: As political tensions rise, this legal battle underscores the growing scrutiny of public statements by elected officials—and the fine line between free speech and criminal defamation. The September trial will be one to watch.
