The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is facing growing criticism after it derecognised the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), a move that has sparked outrage among opposition leaders.
Top figures within the ADC condemned the decision, accusing the electoral body of acting under the influence of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). They also called for the removal of INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, citing a loss of confidence in the commission’s neutrality.
INEC, however, quickly pushed back against these demands. In a statement issued in Abuja, the commission stressed that its leadership and operations are protected by the Nigerian Constitution. It noted that the appointment or removal of its chairman follows a strict legal process and cannot be influenced by political pressure.
The controversy began after INEC announced it would no longer recognise key figures in the ADC, including National Chairman David Mark and National Secretary Rauf Aregbesola. The commission said its decision was based on a court order directing it to maintain the status quo pending the resolution of an ongoing legal dispute within the party.
The ADC has been battling internal leadership issues since 2025, with factions emerging after disagreements over the party’s structure. This has led to multiple court cases and uncertainty over who legitimately controls the party.
Speaking at a press conference, David Mark described INEC’s action as a direct attack on democracy. He argued that the move undermines the rights of Nigerians to freely associate and participate in political activities. He insisted that the party would continue its operations regardless of the commission’s stance.
INEC defended its decision, explaining that it was necessary to comply with a Court of Appeal ruling and avoid legal complications similar to past cases where elected officials lost their positions due to disobedience of court orders.
The commission also rejected claims that it was working to weaken opposition parties. It pointed to the recent recognition of new political parties as evidence of its commitment to a multi-party system. According to INEC, it remains a neutral regulator and will not interfere in internal party disputes.
Meanwhile, concerns have been raised about the potential impact of the crisis on upcoming elections, particularly in Ekiti and Osun states. Observers warn that the internal conflict within the ADC could affect its readiness and participation.
Other political stakeholders have urged caution. The Inter-Party Advisory Council called on INEC to handle the situation carefully and ensure fairness in addressing internal party disputes. It also warned that poorly timed electoral processes could strain political parties and disenfranchise voters.
Read Also;
Court Refuses Bid to Bar Senator Kingibe from ADC Activities
The ruling APC dismissed allegations of interference, insisting that the ADC’s problems are self-inflicted. The party argued that internal mismanagement, not external influence, is responsible for the crisis.
As tensions continue to rise, the situation has also triggered protests and heightened security presence around INEC’s headquarters in Abuja. While some groups have rallied in support of the commission’s decision, others are mobilising against it.
With legal battles still ongoing and political tempers flaring, the ADC crisis is shaping up to be a significant test for Nigeria’s electoral system ahead of the 2027 general elections.
