The Lagos State Police Command has officially clarified the nature of the controversial object held by Pastor Paul Adefarasin in a viral video that sparked public concern, confirming that it was not a firearm but a stun gun, classified under prohibited anti-riot equipment.
In a statement released Tuesday via the Command’s verified X handle (formerly Twitter), authorities confirmed that the House on the Rock Church founder voluntarily presented himself at the Command Headquarters in Ikeja, where he was interrogated and made a cautionary statement.
Key Clarifications
The video, which surfaced last week, showed Pastor Adefarasin wielding a gun-like object while confronting another road user. The footage triggered widespread speculation and backlash, especially as the vehicle involved was reportedly unregistered.
However, the police have now put to rest fears of unlawful possession of firearms.
“What was recovered from him… is not a lethal weapon or firearm but a stun gun, which is a prohibited anti-riot equipment,” the police statement read.
Voluntary Cooperation and Bail
The police commended Adefarasin for cooperating with their inquiry, noting that he turned himself in without coercion.
“Pastor Paul Adefarasin… was interrogated, and he volunteered a cautionary statement to the police investigators,” the statement added.
Following his statement, Adefarasin was granted administrative bail, pending the conclusion of investigations.
Public Assurances and Legal Implications
While a stun gun is not classified as a firearm, its possession by private individuals remains illegal under Nigerian law unless authorised. The police confirmed that further investigations are ongoing to determine the circumstances and legality surrounding Adefarasin’s possession of the device.
“Investigations continue into the case, and the outcome will be made public,” the Command assured.
Public Reaction and Broader Questions
Although the clarification offers some relief to concerned Nigerians, the incident raises broader issues about:
-
The use of prohibited security devices by civilians,
-
Vehicle registration compliance among prominent figures,
-
And the role of public accountability for individuals in positions of spiritual or moral leadership.
As authorities continue their investigation, the public awaits whether this episode ends with a mere caution or leads to further legal consequences.
In the meantime, the incident serves as a reminder of the responsibility public figures bear, especially when it comes to conduct in highly sensitive or confrontational scenarios.
